|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Team Orientation, Self-Orientation, and Diversity in Task Groups
Their Connection to Team Performance Over Time
Warren E. Watson
University of North Texas
Lynn Johnson
University of North Texas
Deanna Merritt
Christian Brothers University
Members of more than 50 student groups involved in a team problem-solving environment were surveyed with the Group Style Instrument (GSI) to examine interpersonal group processes for task groups. Analyses of the GSI data resulted in team-oriented and self-oriented dimensions for both samples by comparing several factor models. In a second sample, more than 80 culturally diverse and nondiverse groups involved in a similar team problem-solving format completed the GSI at three points in time after they had completed team projects involving substantial collaborative member effort. For Sample 2, culturally diverse teams reported more self-oriented behaviors (SOBs) over time and performed better that nondiverse teams on two of the three projects. Periodic feedback regarding team performance and interpersonal processing was given to all teams. By the third team project, nondiverse teams performed better. Emphasis is given concerning the importance of managing the balance of team-orientated behaviors and SOBs within teams over time.
Group & Organization Management, Vol. 23, No. 2,
161-188 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/1059601198232005

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.-L. Friedemann, H. Pagan-Coss, and C. Mayorga
The Workings of a Multicultural Research Team
J Transcult Nurs,
July 1, 2008;
19(3):
266 - 273.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Mathieu, M. T. Maynard, T. Rapp, and L. Gilson
Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future
Journal of Management,
June 1, 2008;
34(3):
410 - 476.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Seyyed Babak Alavi and J. McCormick
Measurement of Vertical and Horizontal Idiocentrism and Allocentrism in Small Groups
Small Group Research,
August 1, 2007;
38(4):
556 - 564.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. W. Pitts
Modeling the Impact of Diversity Management
Review of Public Personnel Administration,
September 1, 2006;
26(3):
245 - 268.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. V. Hobman, P. Bordia, and C. Gallois
Perceived Dissimilarity and Work Group Involvement: The Moderating Effects of Group Openness to Diversity
Group Organization Management,
October 1, 2004;
29(5):
560 - 587.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. G. L. Romme
Perceptions of the Value of Microworld Simulation: Research Note
Simulation Gaming,
September 1, 2004;
35(3):
427 - 436.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. L. Kirkman, P. E. Tesluk, and B. Rosen
The Impact of Demographic Heterogeneity and Team Leader-Team Member Demographic Fit on Team Empowerment and Effectiveness
Group Organization Management,
June 1, 2004;
29(3):
334 - 368.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. E. Jackson, A. Joshi, and N. L. Erhardt
Recent Research on Team and Organizational Diversity: SWOT Analysis and Implications
Journal of Management,
December 1, 2003;
29(6):
801 - 830.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. G. L. Romme
Learning Outcomes of Microworlds for Management Education
Management Learning,
March 1, 2003;
34(1):
51 - 61.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. C. Tonn and V. Milledge
Team Building in an MBA "Gateway" Course: Lessons Learned
Journal of Management Education,
August 1, 2002;
26(4):
415 - 428.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|