This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Seers, A. Articles by Cashman, J. F. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Team-Member Exchange Under Team and Traditional Management

A Naturally Occurring Quasi-Experiment

University of Alabama

M. M. Petty

University of Alabama

James F. Cashman

University of Alabama

The quality of exchange relationships between work teams and their members was assessed for 103 manufacturing workers. Higher levels of team-member exchange quality, as well as of cohesiveness, satisfaction with coworkers, and general job satisfaction were reported by members of teams expected to be self-managing in contrast to teams expected to function as traditional work groups. Gains in departmental production efficiency were also found to be related to the work unit's average change in team-member exchange over time.

Group & Organization Management, Vol. 20, No. 1, 18-38 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/1059601195201003


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Chiocchio and H. Essiembre Cohesion and Performance: A Meta-Analytic Review of Disparities Between Project Teams, Production Teams, and Service Teams Small Group Research, August 1, 2009; 40(4): 382 - 420. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. S. Love and M. Forret Exchange Relationships at Work: An Examination of the Relationship Between Team-Member Exchange and Supervisor Reports of Organizational Citizenship Behavior Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, May 1, 2008; 14(4): 342 - 352. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. H. M. Tse and M. T. Dasborough A Study of Exchange and Emotions in Team Member Relationships Group Organization Management, April 1, 2008; 33(2): 194 - 215. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. R. Evans and W. D. Davis High-Performance Work Systems and Organizational Performance: The Mediating Role of Internal Social Structure Journal of Management, October 1, 2005; 31(5): 758 - 775. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. van Mierlo, C. G. Rutte, M. A. J. Kompier, and H. A. C. M. Doorewaard Self-Managing Teamwork and Psychological Well-Being: Review of a Multilevel Research Domain Group Organization Management, April 1, 2005; 30(2): 211 - 235. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. L. Sinclair The Effects Of Justice And Cooperation On Team Effectiveness Small Group Research, February 1, 2003; 34(1): 74 - 100. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. H. Jordan, H. S. Feild, and A. A. Armenakis The Relationship of Group Process Variables and Team Performance: A Team-Level Analysis in a Field Setting Small Group Research, February 1, 2002; 33(1): 121 - 150. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Hoegl and H. G. Gemuenden Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects: A Theoretical Concept and Empirical Evidence Organization Science, July 1, 2001; 12(4): 435 - 449. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. A. Kolb The Relationship Between Self-Monitoring and Leadership in Student Project Groups Journal of Business Communication, April 1, 1998; 35(2): 264 - 282. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. G. Cohen and D. E. Bailey What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite Journal of Management, June 1, 1997; 23(3): 239 - 290. [Abstract] [PDF]